Loading...
Skip

Dr James Chesterman

Specialist Periodontist, Restorative and Implant Dentist

  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
Skip to content
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
  • Treatments
    • Dental Implants
    • Gum Disease
    • Restorative Treatments
    • Root Canal Treatment
  • Cases
    • Implant cases
    • Periodontal cases
    • Endodontic cases
    • Restorative cases
  • Refer a patient
  • Arrange a consultation
  • Courses
Home
Search

Cases

Implant cases

Periodontal cases

Endodontic cases

Restorative cases

Like Loading...
Churchview Dental Care
5-7 church Lane
Leeds, LS15 8BB
0113 2647133
office@cvdc.co.uk
Honesty at the Oaks
192 SWAN AVENUE
Eldwick Bingley, BD16 3PA
01274 270579
email@theoaksdentalpractice.com
Barrier membranes remain one of the key components of successful guided bone regeneration (GBR). While bone graft materials often receive most of the attention, the membrane plays a critical role in excluding soft tissue cells, maintaining a protected regenerative environment, and allowing osteogenic cells the time and space needed to form new bone. The ideal membrane should combine biocompatibility, space maintenance, predictable resorption, and excellent clinical handling. Which implant placement type is considered the most predictable for aesthetic outcomes in sites with a thin or damaged facial bone wall, and why? Great conference in Vienna. A regenerative surgery on LL5 with MIST - simplified papillae preservation. Regenerative materials emdogain and BioOss used. 6 month radiographic and clinical review. Pockets reduced from 10mm to 5mm. Vitality/sensibility testing positive throughout.. This case was managed with oral hygiene advice including toothbrushing and interdental cleaning to initially reduce inflammation (Step 1) RT1 recession defects may be possible to gain complete root coverage. RT2 defects are typically only possible to get partial coverage. Implant exposure following placement and GBR. CT graft to augment the buccal soft tissue. In this case the quality of the buccal tissue was reasonable but lacked volume. A small CT graft was performed to improve this profile. A difficult clinical question is when is soft tissue grafting required and what type of graft will be suitable. The timing of the grafting also varies across expert opinions. Implant placement with simultaneous GBR UR1. How much buccal bone thickness are we aiming for? 2mm should provide long term stability for hard and soft tissue dimensions. In this case a thin <1mm buccal plate remained. A compromise between angulation and maintaining the implant within native bone was considered in this case. Please register your interest for future periodontal and restorative courses. This will give you a chance to influence what we prioritise. We hope to provide a range of courses covering periodontal, restorative and implant dentistry with a focus on the perio-restorative interface.
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
  • Treatments
    • Dental Implants
    • Gum Disease
    • Restorative Treatments
    • Root Canal Treatment
  • Cases
    • Implant cases
    • Periodontal cases
    • Endodontic cases
    • Restorative cases
  • Refer a patient
  • Arrange a consultation
  • Courses
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
Press Enter To Begin Your Search
×
    • Dr James Chesterman
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • Manage subscriptions

Loading Comments...

    %d